APEX Conditions and Performance

Thanks to a tweet of Scott Wesley (@swesley_perth), I stumbled upon this blog post by Tony Andrews. In that blog Tony lists a few examples of APEX Conditions and concludes that the declarative approach must be the best way of doing it. Although his assumptions and conclusions makes a lot of sense, I wondered whether it was actually true and what the difference in performance would be. So I created a very similar test myself and take a look at the debug output. And here are the results (in microseconds) ...

Type	Statement	Run 1	Run 2
Declarative	...<nothing here>...	653	667
PL/SQL Expression	"...Execute Statement: begin wwv_flow.g_boolean := :P3_JOB_ID = 'AD_PRES'; end;”	1533	1823
SQL Exists	...Execute Statement: select count(*) from sys.dual where exists (SELECT NULL FROM DUAL WHERE :P3_JOB_ID = 'AD_PRES')	1684	2023
PL/SQL Function	"""...Execute Statement: declare function x return boolean is begin begin" return :P3_JOB_ID = 'AD_PRES'; end; " return null; end; begin wwv_flow.g_boolean := x; end;""	2537	1528

So from the table above you can safely conclude that Tony's assumptions and conclusions are actually true. Using a declarative condition is on average two to three times faster than one of the other options. And although it are just very small numbers, when you have a lot of conditions and a lot of users hitting the page - it might add up in the end!
When can't use the declarative approach and you have to choose between one of the others, it doesn't really seem to matter ... in this case. But you have to check that in your situation yourself!

Comments

Filtering in the APEX Interactive Grid

Remember Oracle Forms? One of the nice features of Forms was the use of GLOBAL items. More or less comparable to Application Items in APEX. These GLOBALS where often used to pre-query data. For example you queried Employee 200 in Form A, then opened Form B and on opening that Form the Employee field is filled with that (GLOBAL) value of 200 and the query was executed. So without additional keys strokes or entering data, when switching to another Form a user would immediately see the data in the same context. And they loved that. In APEX you can create a similar experience using Application Items (or an Item on the Global Page) for Classic Reports (by setting a Default Value to a Search Item) and Interactive Reports (using the APEX_IR.ADD_FILTER procedure). But what about the Interactive Grid? There is no APEX_IG package ... so the first thing we have to figure out is how can we set a filter programmatically? Start with creating an Interactive Grid based upon the good o...

apex_application.g_f0x array processing in Oracle 12

If you created your own "updatable reports" or your custom version of tabular forms in Oracle Application Express, you'll end up with a query that looks similar to this one: then you disable the " Escape special characters " property and the result is an updatable multirecord form. That was easy, right? But now we need to process the changes in the Ename column when the form is submitted, but only if the checkbox is checked. All the columns are submitted as separated arrays, named apex_application.g_f0x - where the "x" is the value of the "p_idx" parameter you specified in the apex_item calls. So we have apex_application.g_f01, g_f02 and g_f03. But then you discover APEX has the oddity that the "checkbox" array only contains values for the checked rows. Thus if you just check "Jones", the length of g_f02 is 1 and it contains only the empno of Jones - while the other two arrays will contain all (14) rows. So for ...

Stop using validations for checking constraints !

If you run your APEX application - like a Form based on the EMP table - and test if you can change the value of Department to something else then the standard values of 10, 20, 30 or 40, you'll get a nice error message like this: But it isn't really nice, is it? So what do a lot of developers do? They create a validation (just) in order to show a nicer, better worded, error message like "This is not a valid department". And what you then just did is writing code twice : Once in the database as a (foreign key) check constraint and once as a sql statement in your validation. And we all know : writing code twice is usually not a good idea - and executing the same query twice is not enhancing your performance! So how can we transform that ugly error message into something nice? By combining two APEX features: the Error Handling Function and the Text Messages! Start with copying the example of an Error Handling Function from the APEX documentation. Create this function ...

Roels Blog

Search This Blog