Skip to main content

Collaborate 2011 - Day 2

The second day of Collaborate started with a opening general session by Dan Thurmon. Dan is a so called "motivational speaker". And he sure knows is job. In a very American style he promoted his dogma:"Off Balance, On Purpose", demonstrated with juggling (even with axes on a one-wheeler). A very funny start of this day!
The first "real" session I attended was SQL Techniques by Tom Kyte. It was all about Clustering, setting up Index Organized Tables (IOT's) and Partitioning. The goal of all these techniques is to reduce IO. A nice metaphore he used was: You can put your clothes in a closet by just dumping them on the first free spot you see. So inserts are fast, but then retrieval trakes a full scan of your closet. By clustering pants, sweaters and socks together, inserts may be slower, but retrieval is way faster! But not only picking the right storage approach is important, also the retrieval - like using bulk/array fetching - are both important to reduce resources and increase performance and thus scalability. Don't tune queries, tune your approach!
Next on the agenda was Analytic Functions - Revisited. I am already familiar with this technique, but there still are some hidden gems to explore, like the package dbms_frequent_itemset. This package contains functions to find correlated data. I have to check that once. Also a warning: If you use analytic functions in a view, that might prevent the use of indexes.
The last before lunch was called Why BPEL when I can PL/SQL?. It was a 30 minute power session, clarifying when BPEL might be a better choice over PL/SQL. If you need advanced Fault Managemenrt, using multiple non-Oracle techniques (like SQL Server, DB2 etc) or Human Interaction, BPEL has advantages over PL/SQL.
The first presentation after lunch was Tips and Techniques Integrating Oracle XML DB. Due to some (or a lot of) technical difficulties the presenter couldn't do his demo in SQL Developer and had to stick to the slides - which contained lots of code samples. Couldn't bring his point that way. 
Metadata Matters was originally a Tom Kyte presentation (I think I've seen it before), but now done by one of his Oracle colleagues. Very well done I must say. The point was: Put as much (meta)information into the database as you can, and let the optimizer decide what to do with it. The more it knows, the better it can do it's job! So put in all constraints, and even datatypes are constraints! And also "size does matter". If a developer defines all strings as varchar2(4000) - just to be sure - then the amount of memory needed for returning a result set is way bigger than when you specify the real lenght. Check constraints can be used by the optimizer to rewrite queries - and reduce IO and speed up performance. If you define columns as NOT NULL you create more access paths for the optimizer, like using and index scan instead of a table scan. You can even "tweak" this for columns that can be NULL, by appending a fixed value to thee column value when creating the index - just to be sure every row is represented in the index.
Referential constraints can be used to remove tables from the query plan. And constraints can also be used for applying a query rewrite (so a materialized view can be used for delivering the result set instead of scanning the original table(s)). 
Most important: Java applications shouldn't handle all integrity and rules, because they can't do it as fast and as good as the Oracle database does that job. Don't try to reinvent that wheel, Oracle has over 25 years of experience in that field and it's all at your disposal! So don't think you can do better within the timeframe of your project!
The last presentation of today was Giving Winning Presentations by Rich Niemiec. Funny, entertaining and with lost of tips on how to make your point during a presentation. I don't like his slides though.... ;-)
Now off to the Welcome Reception!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fix Interactive Report headers issue when using a Region Display Selector

When you have multiple Interactive Reports (IR) on your page and use a Region Display Selector to mimic tabs, you might notice some weird behaviour in the IR headings if you switch tabs. The headings are not positioned correctly and you get an extra empty row under the headings. It just looks weird and ugly. But if you resize your browser window, it all looks fine again (until you switch to another tab..) So can we fix this by creating a Dynamic Action that mimics that "browser window resize" event? Yes we can! Create a Dynamic Action that fires on Click of the jQuery selector li.apex-rds-item a . That should fire a JavaScript snippet :  apex.event.trigger(this.triggeringElement, "apexwindowresized"); So now a click on a tab not only switches from one IR to another but also fires that event that will "autofix" the IR headers. A simple solution for an annoying problem. This applies to APEX 5.0, I assume it will be solved in 5.1.

How to create neatly formatted Excel documents using PL/SQL?

If there is a requirement to produce output from an application into Excel, you would probably create a CSV (Comma Separated File) with the data and start Excel to show the data - at least that's what I did...until now. The drawback of this solution is that you could only produce data and no nice layout. But Excel is also capable of opening HTML-files and using this you could create Excel files with data and magnificent layout! Let me give an example: 1. Create a procedure to show the data in formatted in an HTML table. CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE display_emp_list IS v_emp_count NUMBER(5); v_empno NUMBER(8); v_ename VARCHAR2(50); v_job emp.job%TYPE; v_sal emp.sal%TYPE; v_bg_color VARCHAR2(10) := ''; CURSOR c_emp IS SELECT empno, initcap(ename), job, sal FROM emp ORDER BY ename; BEGIN SELECT COUNT(*) INTO v_emp_count FROM emp; owa_util.mime_header('application/ms-excel', FALSE); htp.p('Content...

Refresh selected row(s) in an Interactive Grid

In my previous post I blogged about pushing changed rows from the dabatase into an Interactive Grid . The use case I'll cover right here is probably more common - and therefore more useful! Until we had the IG, we showed the data in a report (Interactive or Classic). Changes to the data where made by popping up a form page, making changes, saving and refreshing the report upon closing the dialog. Or by clicking an icon / button / link in your report that makes some changes to the data (like changing a status) and ... refresh the report.  That all works fine, but the downsides are: The whole dataset is returned from the server to the client - again and again. And if your pagination size is large, that does lead to more and more network traffic, more interpretation by the browser and more waiting time for the end user. The "current record" might be out of focus after the refresh, especially by larger pagination sizes, as the first rows will be shown. Or (even wors...