Skip to main content

APEX 4.0 New Features

At OOW some new features of the upcoming major release of APEX, version 4.0, were revealed - ofcourse with all the regular disclamers applied. Here a (non complete) list of the announced features - in a random order:
  1. The option to use an Application Timestamp Format, next to the existing Application Date Format;
  2. The option to use the Client Time Zone;
  3. jQuery will be included in the APEX distribution;
  4. instead of the (horrible) HTML-calendars, the much better looking jQuery Calendar will be used;
  5. the jQuery Calendar will offer an Extensible Item Framework, to create your own calendar types;
  6. ofcourse the famous Websheets;
  7. an Oracle APEX Listener as a replacement for the MOD/PLSQL gateway;
  8. Improved Tabular Forms, thus reducing the need to build these manually;
  9. more JSON;
  10. Dynamic Recreation of Select List (from JSON), used - o.a. - for cascading LOV's;
  11. Namespaced apex.*.*, to reduce the risk of confusing variables in Javascript;
  12. Chainability;
  13. and last, but certainly not least, Dynamic Actions.
At the demo booth I saw a demonstration of these Dynamic Actions: a declarative way to define show/hide and enable/disable of items - depending on other items values. The goal is to reduce the manual Javascript coding. This was just a first example and more functions will be added in the final version. Also the option to create a Dynamic Action for a validation (e.g. P3_ORDER_DATE is not null) will be available in the future!

Reading this everbody screams : I want it and I want it now! But you have to be patient. The 4.0 release is aimed at "early 2009". First we should get our hands on the 3.2 release (this year), supporting the Forms2Apex migration.

Comments

Stew said…
Sounds like pretty interesting stuff - especially the improved Tabular Forms (since they're used so much), Dynamic Actions and the WebSheets.

I hope they also work out the kinks in some of the existing minor features. For example, couldn't they come up with a better interface for editing Standard and Parent Tabs? I was working with them yesterday and it felt very cumbersome. :-(

Thanks for sharing this stuff.
Roel said…
@Stew
I remember that at one of the sessions someone in the audience also complained about managing tabs. As I recall the development team was also looking into that.
Anonymous said…
You said...

"an Oracle APEX Listener as a replacement for the MOD/PLSQL gateway;"

... what does this really mean? Any more details on this?
Stew said…
Roel,

Thanks for the good news on that issue.
Patrick Wolf said…
Roel,

my impression was that APEX 4.0 is not planned for "early 2009", it's more targeted for summer/fall.

BTW, was nice to meet you!
Patrick
Roel said…
@Anonymous
Some more info on the Oracle APEX Listener you can find at the forum in this post : http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=2791285

@Patrick
Nice meeting again indeed! The "early 2009" is mentioned in one of the presentations of Oracle (with the regular disclaimers..). We'll see...
Stirl said…
Thanks that was very informative.

I cannot wait for jQuery and the jQuery calendars...
Drew said…
More important to me is the output/printing/export capability of the Interactive Reports. They are great but on the display, but horrible upon "download". That feature is supposed to be included in 4.0, export to Word, Excel, HTML, PDF, what is on screen, should be similar to the output.

Anyone know the date yet?

Popular posts from this blog

Refresh selected row(s) in an Interactive Grid

In my previous post I blogged about pushing changed rows from the dabatase into an Interactive Grid. The use case I'll cover right here is probably more common - and therefore more useful!

Until we had the IG, we showed the data in a report (Interactive or Classic). Changes to the data where made by popping up a form page, making changes, saving and refreshing the report upon closing the dialog. Or by clicking an icon / button / link in your report that makes some changes to the data (like changing a status) and ... refresh the report.  That all works fine, but the downsides are: The whole dataset is returned from the server to the client - again and again. And if your pagination size is large, that does lead to more and more network traffic, more interpretation by the browser and more waiting time for the end user.The "current record" might be out of focus after the refresh, especially by larger pagination sizes, as the first rows will be shown. Or (even worse) while you…

Dockerize your APEX development environment

Nowadays Docker is everywhere. It is one of the main components of Continuous Integration / Continuous Development environments. That alone indicates Docker has to be seen more as a Software Delivery Platform than as a replacement of a virtual machine.

However ...

If you are running an Oracle database using Docker on your local machine to develop some APEX application, you will probably not move that container is a whole to test and production environments. Because in that case you would not only deliver a new APEX application to the production environment - which is a good thing - but also overwrite the data in production with the data from your development environment. And that won't make your users very excited.
So in this set up you will be using Docker as a replacement of a Virtual Machine and not as a Delivery Platform.
And that's exactly the way Martin is using it as he described in this recent blog post. It is an ideal way to get up and running with an Oracle database …

apex_application.g_f0x array processing in Oracle 12

If you created your own "updatable reports" or your custom version of tabular forms in Oracle Application Express, you'll end up with a query that looks similar to this one:
then you disable the "Escape special characters" property and the result is an updatable multirecord form.
That was easy, right? But now we need to process the changes in the Ename column when the form is submitted, but only if the checkbox is checked. All the columns are submitted as separated arrays, named apex_application.g_f0x - where the "x" is the value of the "p_idx" parameter you specified in the apex_item calls. So we have apex_application.g_f01, g_f02 and g_f03. But then you discover APEX has the oddity that the "checkbox" array only contains values for the checked rows. Thus if you just check "Jones", the length of g_f02 is 1 and it contains only the empno of Jones - while the other two arrays will contain all (14) rows. So for processing y…