Skip to main content

Consuming a REST Web Service returning JSON in APEX

By
In APEX you can define a web service that returns XML as below - all declarative, just a few steps through a wizard.


Then generate a report on top of that web service - again just a few clicks through a wizard. The generated query looks like this:

select xtab."customerName"
     , xtab."customerId"
  from apex_collections c, 
          XMLTable('/Response/S_getCustomerListTableArray/S_getCustomerListArrayItem' passing xmltype001
            COLUMNS "customerName" PATH 'customerName'
                  , "customerId"   PATH 'customerId'
          ) xtab
 where c.collection_name = 'CUSTOMERLIST'

So the result of the web service is stored in an XMLTYPE column. And it's easy to spot where you're definitions for the Response XPath and Output Parameters are used.

But what if your web service returns JSON - as more and more web services will do so? If you switch the Output Format of the web service definition to JSON, the Response XPath property and the Output Parameters are not enterable. And if you generate a report on top of that web service, the resulting query is a - disappointing - 

select c.clob001
from apex_collections c
where c.collection_name = 'CUSTOMERLIST'

and your report will show a JSON dump. Not exactly what you're hoping for. And notice the result is stored in a CLOB.

But since 12c, the JSON support in the Oracle database has improved a lot and we can easily use that in our query. So if we rewrite our query to 

select cust.*
from   apex_collections
,      json_table(clob001, '$.Response.S_getCustomerListTableArray.S_getCustomerListArrayItem[*]'
       columns ( "customerName"   PATH '$.customerName'
               , "customerId"     PATH '$.customerId'
               )) cust
where collection_name = 'CUSTOMERLIST'

we will get the same result as the - old fashioned - XML one! And as you can see the code is very much alike and could be generated by APEX itself just like the XML version.

So I expect that in a future version this functionality will be added to the APEX builder - it shouldn't be that hard to implement! And maybe the apex_collections can have a real "JSON" column as well (in fact it would still be a CLOB with an "IS JSON" check).

The only prerequisite is, you have to run APEX on version 12c of the database. If you want to know more about JSON in the database, there is a serie of blog posts about this, starting here.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Filtering in the APEX Interactive Grid

By
Remember Oracle Forms? One of the nice features of Forms was the use of GLOBAL items. More or less comparable to Application Items in APEX. These GLOBALS where often used to pre-query data. For example you queried Employee 200 in Form A, then opened Form B and on opening that Form the Employee field is filled with that (GLOBAL) value of 200 and the query was executed. So without additional keys strokes or entering data, when switching to another Form a user would immediately see the data in the same context. And they loved that. In APEX you can create a similar experience using Application Items (or an Item on the Global Page) for Classic Reports (by setting a Default Value to a Search Item) and Interactive Reports (using the  APEX_IR.ADD_FILTER  procedure). But what about the Interactive Grid? There is no APEX_IG package ... so the first thing we have to figure out is how can we set a filter programmatically? Start with creating an Interactive Grid based upon the good old Employ
1 comment
Read more

apex_application.g_f0x array processing in Oracle 12

By
If you created your own "updatable reports" or your custom version of tabular forms in Oracle Application Express, you'll end up with a query that looks similar to this one: then you disable the " Escape special characters " property and the result is an updatable multirecord form. That was easy, right? But now we need to process the changes in the Ename column when the form is submitted, but only if the checkbox is checked. All the columns are submitted as separated arrays, named apex_application.g_f0x - where the "x" is the value of the "p_idx" parameter you specified in the apex_item calls. So we have apex_application.g_f01, g_f02 and g_f03. But then you discover APEX has the oddity that the "checkbox" array only contains values for the checked rows. Thus if you just check "Jones", the length of g_f02 is 1 and it contains only the empno of Jones - while the other two arrays will contain all (14) rows. So for
Post a Comment
Read more

Stop using validations for checking constraints !

By
 If you run your APEX application - like a Form based on the EMP table - and test if you can change the value of Department to something else then the standard values of 10, 20, 30 or 40, you'll get a nice error message like this: But it isn't really nice, is it? So what do a lot of developers do? They create a validation (just) in order to show a nicer, better worded, error message like "This is not a valid department".  And what you then just did is writing code twice : Once in the database as a (foreign key) check constraint and once as a sql statement in your validation. And we all know : writing code twice is usually not a good idea - and executing the same query twice is not enhancing your performance! So how can we transform that ugly error message into something nice? By combining two APEX features: the Error Handling Function and the Text Messages! Start with copying the example of an Error Handling Function from the APEX documentation. Create this function
Post a Comment
Read more