Skip to main content

OOW 2013 : The new Oracle In-Memory Database

Today the new In-Memory technique for the Oracle database has been introduced. This is not something like TimesTen(+) or so, but a new way of querying data. The concept is like this: All tables that are marked for keeping data in-memory, will be "stored" using both row and column format. The good old row format will be used for the regular OLTP systems, while the column format is used for queries. To speed up those queries, the column format will be held in-memory - and in-memory only. Only the row format goes to disk, just like nowadays. 
To keep all data in sync, the in-memory data will be marked stale during a DML option that affects that data. Therefore the overhead added to DML statements is very small. Upon request the in-memory data will be updated. 
This in-memory data, a.k.a. the "Column Store" is an optional component of the SGA. So you have to switch it on. And you can pick which tables, which partitions, which columns and whether you want it distributed or not (over different RAC nodes) should be kept in-memory. 
The columnar data is loaded in compressed format. So it just takes a fraction of the space that the same total number of rows use (as usually a lot of columns contain the same values and can be more compressed). And this column store can / will be indexed as well.
So you can have an OLTP and a Data Warehouse / Reporting on the same structures. And depending on your query and data , the optimiser will either use the buffer cache or the column store. So the optimiser is "fully aware" of the in-memory database.
The In-Memory database is planned as an option (so additional licensing required) for the 12.1.0.2 release of the databae - expected next calendar year.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Refresh selected row(s) in an Interactive Grid

In my previous post I blogged about pushing changed rows from the dabatase into an Interactive Grid. The use case I'll cover right here is probably more common - and therefore more useful!

Until we had the IG, we showed the data in a report (Interactive or Classic). Changes to the data where made by popping up a form page, making changes, saving and refreshing the report upon closing the dialog. Or by clicking an icon / button / link in your report that makes some changes to the data (like changing a status) and ... refresh the report.  That all works fine, but the downsides are: The whole dataset is returned from the server to the client - again and again. And if your pagination size is large, that does lead to more and more network traffic, more interpretation by the browser and more waiting time for the end user.The "current record" might be out of focus after the refresh, especially by larger pagination sizes, as the first rows will be shown. Or (even worse) while you…

Dockerize your APEX development environment

Nowadays Docker is everywhere. It is one of the main components of Continuous Integration / Continuous Development environments. That alone indicates Docker has to be seen more as a Software Delivery Platform than as a replacement of a virtual machine.

However ...

If you are running an Oracle database using Docker on your local machine to develop some APEX application, you will probably not move that container is a whole to test and production environments. Because in that case you would not only deliver a new APEX application to the production environment - which is a good thing - but also overwrite the data in production with the data from your development environment. And that won't make your users very excited.
So in this set up you will be using Docker as a replacement of a Virtual Machine and not as a Delivery Platform.
And that's exactly the way Martin is using it as he described in this recent blog post. It is an ideal way to get up and running with an Oracle database …

apex_application.g_f0x array processing in Oracle 12

If you created your own "updatable reports" or your custom version of tabular forms in Oracle Application Express, you'll end up with a query that looks similar to this one:
then you disable the "Escape special characters" property and the result is an updatable multirecord form.
That was easy, right? But now we need to process the changes in the Ename column when the form is submitted, but only if the checkbox is checked. All the columns are submitted as separated arrays, named apex_application.g_f0x - where the "x" is the value of the "p_idx" parameter you specified in the apex_item calls. So we have apex_application.g_f01, g_f02 and g_f03. But then you discover APEX has the oddity that the "checkbox" array only contains values for the checked rows. Thus if you just check "Jones", the length of g_f02 is 1 and it contains only the empno of Jones - while the other two arrays will contain all (14) rows. So for processing y…