tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20567072.post4309812205737849538..comments2024-01-27T11:19:30.468+01:00Comments on Roels Blog: Updateable IR...at least sort of ..(a.k.a calling an On Demand Process on a Public Page)Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03932233704705635918noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20567072.post-76169203829291380982009-02-03T15:58:00.000+01:002009-02-03T15:58:00.000+01:00Perfect! :-)Perfect! :-)Patrick Wolfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16652802762749621200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20567072.post-53962434325635780422009-02-03T10:35:00.000+01:002009-02-03T10:35:00.000+01:00Patrick,Ok, I think that a combination of the 2 wo...Patrick,<BR/><BR/>Ok, I think that a combination of the 2 would make sense, so we default to the "current page", but still provide an optional parameter for the page for the situation Patrick mentioned, (as we are currently looking at page level on-demands) and also where the developer wants to leverage other components (such as regions) defined on different pages.<BR/><BR/>Anthony.Anthony Raynerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04412495232341508437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20567072.post-86735499467231234782009-02-02T12:03:00.000+01:002009-02-02T12:03:00.000+01:00Hi,I think it would make sense to always use "curr...Hi,<BR/><BR/>I think it would make sense to always use "current page" instead of page 0 as Roel suggested. An extra parameter for the page would only make sense if page level on-demand processes are supported in the future and a developer wants to call an on-demand process of another page.<BR/><BR/>Cheers<BR/>PatrickPatrick Wolfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16652802762749621200noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20567072.post-38732530780209443192009-01-30T14:48:00.000+01:002009-01-30T14:48:00.000+01:00Hi Anthony,And looking at the code it seems not so...Hi Anthony,<BR/><BR/>And looking at the code it seems not so difficult to make that adjustment.<BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/>RoelRoelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07819238980013808276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20567072.post-19096382801299728962009-01-30T12:27:00.000+01:002009-01-30T12:27:00.000+01:00Hi Roel,I agree, it makes sense to be able to spec...Hi Roel,<BR/><BR/>I agree, it makes sense to be able to specify the page for the namespaced version as well. We will look into this.<BR/><BR/>Anthony.Anthony Raynerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04412495232341508437noreply@blogger.com